Cost-Plus Pricing Demonstrates Value to Clients


By Ira Friedman February 8,2013


 
Ira Friedman is the CEO of Bay Audio, a
manufacturer of custom speaker solutions.
He holds an MBA from the Harvard Business School.
Savvy clients demand pricing transparency, as they should. To the client, the practice of estimating projects using a combination of market pricing and hourly labor rates seems confusing. Most products listed on a proposal are foreign to the buyer, can’t be easily shopped online, and make the client question the product’s value. Then again, labor rates charged by many integrators are higher than rates that clients pay to their CPA, physical therapist, and their kid’s violin instructor. Therefore, the value proposition seems off-balance.

Your penchant for choosing obscure products and creating additional labor categories frustrate the client even more. Which begs the question, “Why not increase pricing transparency, refocusing the client on the overall project and away from the price of the TV?”

The cost-plus pricing method will become, in my opinion, the de facto pricing strategy in the near future. Used by network providers and interior designers, cost-plus satisfies the demand for pricing transparency and shifts the focus to engineering, installation, and service.

The AV industry has enjoyed outsized product margins for years, and has used these margins to offset (and ignore) labor inefficiencies. Most integrators earn slim profits on labor, relying on product margins to float the business.

Clients demand low product margins. And the market demands efficient use of labor. Surely, costplus pricing satisfies the client, but it puts pressure on labor profits, forcing management to get a grasp on labor costs, capacity, and inefficiencies.

 
Cost-plus pricing puts the power of the purchase back in the client’s hand, resulting in larger projects with higher quality gear.
The networking industry has figured how to pay its personnel well, earn slim product margins, provide high end-user value, and post a nice yearend profit. You can do it, too. By standardizing your systems, creating repeatable in-house processes, and billing for each labor hour.

A Cost-Plus Strategy

With cost-plus, you price products based on landed cost, plus a reasonable mark-up–typically 17 percent. For example, with MSRP pricing, a speaker sells for $300, with a $125 landed cost. That’s close to 58 points of margin. A TV sells for $3,000, with a $2,800 landed cost. That’s a seven-point margin. A system with a TV and five speakers sells for $4,500, with a net margin to the dealer of $1,085.

With a 17-percent cost-plus model, the integrator would sell the speakers for $246 each, and the TV for $3,264, a combined selling price of $4,000, and a net margin of $584.

“But he makes less money!” you scream derisively, “this is stupid.” And you would be right. However, the smart integrator doesn’t sell $300 speakers with the cost-plus model. Instead, he improves performance by selling $500 MSRP speakers, at $245 each. The improved package sells for $4,500, which is the client’s original budget. And the integrator earns $654.

Of course this is a 40-percent drop in gross margin, and that drop needs to be made up somewhere. This is where additional product and labor charges come in.

1. Products require transportation, so each item includes a delivery cost, including the cost of getting the item from the vendor, and the cost of delivering it to the job site. Delivery may add $200 in our example.
2. Cost-plus pricing means just that: every item is invoiced with a 17-percent markup, including the Apple TV, the wireless hub, and the projector.
3. Cost-plus pricing is based on gross dealer cost. Count rebates, freight allowances, and spiffs as “gravy.”
4. Cost-plus pricing puts the power of the purchase back in the client’s hand, resulting in larger projects with higher quality gear. High-quality products tend to require less follow-up and warranty service–areas of the business that tend to rob profits.

How And When To Present Cost-Plus Pricing

As a client, I like to hear about pricing policies at the start of a discussion. It’s on my mind, and I want the question settled before focusing on performance.

I went to an interesting mid-priced restaurant/wine bar last week. The waiter told our four-person table that the restaurant was, in reality, a discount wine store with a high-end kitchen. He encouraged us to walk to the wine racks and choose a bottle. (The restaurant has sommeliers on staff.)

We chose a $35 Riesling–a bottle selling for $70 in other restaurants. We felt we got a great deal, which meant we had no compunction having extra appetizers and dessert. When we were done, we happily walked out, having paid $200 for dinner–more than one would expect to pay at a mid-priced restaurant.

Knowing a pricing policy gives a client confidence. Offering cost-plus sounds great: “We sell products at wholesale plus a nominal 17-percent mark-up to cover purchasing, warehousing, and service. Plus, our labor rates are the same as every high-quality integrator in town.”

After this declaration, you can focus your presentation on the things you do best–system design, engineering, programming, installation, and service. Focusing on the labor side of your business reduces client uneasiness, and allows you to compete with something you can defend: your abilities.

5 Comments

  • avatar

    As a ESC in South Florida, I am shocked that Residential Systems would publish this article. While Bay Audio may be OK with this type of pricing, "prestige" brands,(Crestron, Lutron, Meridian, etc), would most certainly have a different opinion. This model of pricing is prohibited by most manufacturers' Pricing Policies and Dealer Agreements. A dealer could lose their ability to distribute many brands if they were caught adhering to this pricing model. Is Mr. Friedman, (a CE manufacturer CEO), suggesting we do this covertly? Marc Miller, IntelligentDesign, Miami, FL

  • avatar

    Ira Friedman's response: The uninitiated often confuse Cost Plus pricing with discounting. It is not. Discounting is a marketing strategy whereby a seller achieves an advantage by pricing goods below his competition. Cost Plus is a pricing strategy whereby a seller presents goods and services as a package -- shifting the focus from product margin to service margin. Look at any mature Service + Product industry -- from electrical contractors, to IT providers, to home builders, to telephony providers -- and you'll see a Cost Plus strategy. The CE business stands out as an anomaly -- only because the industry is so young. As the industry matures, and ESC's begin distinguishing themselves on their capabilities (and not on the price of their proposals), pricing strategies like Cost Plus will become commonplace. Now let's address the issue of prestige brands and our market pricing concerns. Above all, we want an orderly market characterized by fair practices. So we scorn aggressi

  • avatar

    The above response appears to have gotten cut off. Regardless of what's best for clients & integrators, the fact is that many brands (Sony, Crestron, Lutron, etc) have minimum pricing requirements. If a dealer is caught selling below them, regardless of their strategy, they will be dropped.

  • avatar

    The rest of Ira Friedman's comment: ...ve discounting as it creates chaos. Cost Plus pricing strategies, with their emphasis on labor and services, are well-tolerated, understood, and quite palatable. Indeed, most prestige brands have a well-developed commercial distribution channel where Cost Plus pricing dominates. I'm not advocating ESCs switch to Cost Plus as a matter of practice. Rather, I offer the prospect that Cost Plus pricing will become a standard industry practice within the next few years. Planning ahead, and learning how to present and capitalize on this pricing strategy is simply smart business.

  • avatar

    This is an interesting idea. I appreciate the assumption that the higher the price the better the quality of the product. However your article makes the assumption that higher quality products have less problems. I would strongly question this assumption as so much is now software driven and will continue to increase. I often describe to client that technology is a "moving target." As in it fails and will continue to fail from time to time. Hence the maintenance agreements argument. I would also say that a 17% margin is far below the average of most CIs. Interestingly enough if you take CEDIA classes and look at the yearly survey that CEDIA conducts, You would realize that at 17% for most projects you will be closing your doors shortly. You will have to work twice as hard for less money. I realize this would likely be for those 2-3% of jobs out there if not less, that require the highest in products. Unfortunately at this model for most CIs (i assume 95%) this is not a feasible busine

Add Comment

Text Only 2000 character limit
Enter the word as it is shown in the box below: (Why?) (case sensitive)
The InfoComm Experience Through the Eyes of a Resi Integrator
Read More»
When Failure is Not an Option
Read More»
4 Case Studies in Managing Customer Expectations
Read More»
Impressing My Neighbors, Architects, and Designers
Read More»
Is This Round Two for Independent Retail TV Selling?
Read More»

CEDIA Awards Ceremony 2012
Wisdom Audio Factory Tour
Unexpected Atlanta
Triad DesignerSeries Step-by-Step Install
Top 10 Things to See at CEDIA 2010

+ All Slide Shows
Re: Would a DTV Delay Matter to You?
Read More»
Re: Would You Miss Satellite Radio Too?
Read More»
Re: Is this the end of the Sooloos name?
Read More»
Cesar's Restoration
Read More»
Re: corvette specialty of california
Read More»
Law Offices of David Azizi
Read More»
Re: Intercom system
Read More»
Intercom system
Read More»
Re: CCTV + Recorder
Read More»
Re: CCTV + Recorder
Read More»