Should Manufacturers Reimburse Dealers for Product Recall Repairs?

8/12/2014 5:06:00 PM
GM has recalled almost 25 million (yes, million) cars in the U.S. as of June 30 this year. It has resulted in a $1.2 billion hit to their bottom line. Where does that hit come from? From reimbursing dealers for the necessary repairs, among other charges.

A few months ago, a client of ours received a package in the mail of replacement parts for their motorized screen. Why the package went to them and not to us, I’ll never figure out. But nevertheless, the manufacturer had identified a possible defect and sent out packages of parts. So the customer understandably called us. We then called the manufacturer to get the details. Turns out the screen swayed a little more than they wanted, and they replaced a part in the pulley mechanism. We were told that people inside the company with no screen installation experience were able to do the repair in less than two hours with two people, so we gamely went out to the client, instructions in hand, to do the repair. Upon getting there and inspecting the parts, the instructions, and the mechanism, we knew there was no way an untrained team of two could knock this out in two hours. In fact, it took our team of three people almost four hours to do the full repair, reset the height of the drop, and re-zoom and aim the projector.

The manufacturer never offered to reimburse us for the repair, and I felt it would not be appropriate or good business to bill the customer. So who’s stuck holding the bill for three guys for a full day’s work? Me, the owner. So not only did I lose the money when I paid my guys, I also have an opportunity cost as I wasn’t able to do other work that day with this team.

I called the manufacturer to comment on this and was offered a discount on a future purchase, but that’s beside the point; I shouldn’t have to. If they made a mistake in their product design and development, then they should be on the hook for the repair. Just as a car manufacturer makes good on the labor costs a dealer incurs for a repair. Why should our industry be any different? Manufacturers seem to think their responsibility ends at the product, and not at the customer’s door.

What do you all think? Should manufacturers reimburse dealers for time spent on repairs to products that are defective out of the gate? Should it be limited to defects that affect the entire product line, or to the occasional lemon product as well? How many times have you had to go back to a client’s home to replace something that was DOA? Should the dealer be fully responsible for that labor cost? My opinion is that manufacturers should absolutely reimburse us if a product has a design defect (the car recall example). I’m on the fence about DOA products. Of course I would like to be reimbursed, I’m just questioning whether or not the business case is there. What are your thoughts on the subject? Where should the line be drawn? Or is it already drawn in the right place?
+Todd Anthony Puma is president of The Source Home Theater Installation, Powered by Fregosa Design, in New York City.


No records found
Photo GalleriesMore Galleries >
Doug Henderson and Joe Atkins

Doug Henderson (left) president of Bowers & Wilkins Group North America, and Joe Atkins, Bowers & Wilkins global CEO, invited consumer and t...

BMWs, McLarens, and Volvos

Upon arrival, guests experienced Bowers & Wilkins Automotive products in BMW, McLaren, and Volvo cars (the Maserati wasn’t available...

Demo'ing the McLaren

Bowers & Wilkins North America president Doug Henderson show demonstrates how to open the door on the McLaren.

B&W Speakers in the McLaren

Bowers & Wilkins speakers in the McLaren.

B&W Vintage Living Room

Bowers & Wilkins North America president Doug Henderson shows off the company’s vintage living room space, which featured vintage ge...

The B&W LP Collection

Part of the Bowers & Wilkins vintage living room space is this collection of LP covers that represent a seminal album from each of the com...

The B&W Museum

Bowers & Wilkins had to purchase much of the gear in its museum because most discontinued products were not kept over the last 50 years.

The Wisdom of John Bowers

Words to live by from Bowers & Wilkins founder John Bowers

The History of B&W

A timeline of Bowers & Wilkins’ product and company history

Andy Kerr and Martial Rousseau

Senior product manager Andy Kerr and head of research Martial Rousseau from the U.K. Bowers & Wilkins office. They were showing off the ne...

Turbine Head

  The turbine head for the 800 D3 houses the mid-range speakers.

Andy Kerr

Senior product manager Andy Kerr holds up the very heavy solid-body turbine head.

Historical Flagship Products

A look at the company’s flagship products through its 50-year history

The Legendary Diamond Tweeter Dome

To show off the company’s legendary diamond tweeter dome, one was encased in plastic to protect the brittle material. The tweeter domes ...

Demo'ing the 800 D3 Speakers

Bowers & Wilkins’ new demo room showcases its new flagship 800 D2 speakers, which are the outcomes of one of the company’s mos...

800 D3 Close Up

The silver 6-inch FST midrange drive unit of the 800 D3 uses Bower & Wilkins’ new proprietary Continuum woven material. Developed af...

In-wall Demo

Bower & Wilkins’ showcases its in-wall speakers in this space.

The B&W Nautilus

Bower & Wilkins’ legendary Nautilus is 17 years old but just as contemporary now as it was then.

Nautilus Pricing

A wall plaque in the “Nautilus demo room” itemizing the price of the system

Theater Demo

A theater demo showcasing the flexibility of 800 D2 speakers